Tổng hợp câu hỏi và bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 chủ đề Giáo Dục

Doc24.vnTổng hợp câu hỏi và bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task chủ đề Giáo Dục1. University education should be free to everyone, regardless of income.To what extent do you agreeor disagree?Model Answer 1:Education is an important part of everyone's life and it plays very important role in the growth of anindividual. Making education free for everyone and managing all by the government will be very bigstep towards the rapid growth of society. All parents want to make their children educated by sendingthem to school, colleges but sometimes due to the lack of resources, they have to deprive their childreneven from the basic education. By making education free of all will ensure that nobody will misseducation just because they can’t afford to pay.A government's step of making the education free will set an example in our society. It will show that ifyou have strong will and determination to study and prosper, not having any money or resource will notstop you from making paradigm shift.Education with no fees will identify all those talents which can be at top given education and guidance butget lost because their parents can’t afford to pay for schools. Everyone will stand equal chance to succeed.It will increase the literacy rate of that country and will improve the growth of that country as well. It wasseen in the past that countries having higher literacy rates have been more successful. By makingeducation free, majority of people will be educated, making overall positive environment in oursociety. There will be fewer crimes in society. Educating people will be making them more responsible.Governments should put more emphasis on education by making it free. Just like food and sheltereducation should also be basic right and free for everyone.Model Answer 2:The opinion that every citizen should have the right to study at school or university for free is verycontroversial one. Those, who disagree, refer to enormous expenditures of government in case ofestablishing such laws. Although, hold the viewpoint that not charging people for education couldbecome very beneficial for country and its economy.First, young people from poor families could be very smart. Looking back to history and biographies ofdistinguished people, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available only forfortunate is not fair. Moreover, the state well-being could also be affected, because there would be lackof talented specialists, whose skills was not discovered and developed by proper training.Another advantage of making education free of charge is the happiness of the nation. An individual'sinability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fee cause stress and anxietyin the middle-class society, which can even keep them from having children. Nowadays we can see thatDoc24.vnthe lowest birthrate is in countries where prices of enrollment to highest education institutions are veryhigh. This clearly indicates the fact that citizens of rich countries do not feel able to provide their futureoffspring proper education.Finally, nothing seems to be more beneficial to country's economy than an educated and intelligentnation. Free courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profitthemselves and hence their country. That would surely compensate most expenses of state budget causedby education of no charge.To sum up, even though making all schools free can be very expensive for state's economy, advantagesare invaluable. After several years such improvements would bring fruits of happy, intelligent nationconfident about its future.2. Everyone should stay in school until the age of eighteen. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Read the IELTS compulsory education essayEveryone should stay in school until the age of eighteen. To what extent do you agree or disagree?It is often said that if you want to succeed in life, you need proper education. While there may bearguments for making school compulsory until the age of 18 disagree that this should apply toeveryone.Perhaps the strongest reason for not leaving school early is that it prepares you for your working career. Ifyou leave school early with only basic education, you are unlikely to be able to find any skilled work.Indeed, the education you receive between the ages of 16 and 18 is crucial for anyone who does not want alifetime of unskilled work in factory.Another compelling reason for remaining in school until 18 is that school provides moral and socialeducation too. This is particularly important for people between 16 and 18 who have many temptationsand benefit from the organised framework that school provides. Young people who stay in school until theage of 18 tend to be more responsible and help build stronger society.There are, however, equally strong arguments against making school compulsory until the age of 18. Onesuch argument is that not everyone is academic and that some people benefit more from vocationaltraining. For instance, someone who wants to become car mechanic may find better training and moresatisfaction in an apprentice scheme. Another related argument is that, in today’s world, young people arematuring ever more quickly and are able to make their own life decisions by the age of 16.To my mind, everyone should be encouraged to stay in school until 18 both for social and career reasons.However, believe it would be mistake to make this compulsory bearing in mind that different peoplehave different needs and abilities and the possibilities of other forms of vocational training.3. Subjects such as Art, Sport and Music are being dropped from the school curriculum for subjectsDoc24.vnsuch as Information Technology. Many people children suffer as result of these changes. To whatextent would you support or reject the idea of moving these subjects from school curriculum?In recent times there has been much debate about which subjects should be included on the schoolcurriculum. One particular issue is whether the introduction of more modern subjects such as IT for moretraditional subjects such as art and music disadvantages the pupils. believe that this is difficult questionand different solutions need to be found for primary and secondary schools.There is one major argument in favour of replacing art, music and sport on the curriculum with subjectslike IT. This is that the purpose of school is to prepare children for their working life after school, so thesubjects on the curriculum should be relevant to their potential careers. From this point of view, IT ismuch relevant to schoolchildren as they need to be computer literate if they want to survive in theworkplace. For example, it is easy to see that word processing and programming skills will impressemployers more than the ability to run fast or draw well.There are also, however, strong arguments for retaining the more traditional subjects as part of thecurriculum. One significant counter-argument is that the purpose of education is not just to preparechildren for later careers, but also to develop their all round “culture”. It is important that children leaveschool with some knowledge of art, music and sport as all these are all help develop aspects of youngpeople’s personalities.My own personal point of view is that there is merit in both sides of the debate and that all children shouldstudy some IT, art music and sport at least at primary school. At secondary school, however, childrenshould be offered choice between these subjects so that they can continue to study them if they wish.4. In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadaysnew technology is increasingly being used to teach students. What are the advantages anddisadvantages of this new approach? Sample essay with detailed vocabulary help and advice onstructuring the essay for coherence.As we move into the twenty-first century, technology is affecting many different areas of life andeducation is no exception. Indeed, in some institutions traditional forms of education have beenrevolutionised by new technology to the extent that the lecture is no longer the main method of delivery.While there are variety of benefits to this new approach, there are also significant drawbacks.Perhaps the greatest bonus of the introduction of technology is the flexibility it offers. This is evident intwo different ways. Firstly, it is now no longer essential for students to be present in the lecture theatre fortheir courses. This means that part-time courses for adults who are in employment and distance learningcourses for people in other countries are now much more practical. Another area of flexibility is of coursethat the lecturer and tutor are able to use Moodles, interactive whiteboards and other tools to deliver theirDoc24.vncourses in more stimulating way to large numbers of students.Not everything, however, about the introduction of this new technology into education is positive. Onemajor problem is that not all students are comfortable with using technology, even if they are part of thedigital native generation. This is serious issue as they may suffer from their lack of technological skills.Another related issue is that education is human activity and it works best with as much humaninteraction as possible. Impersonal technology cannot replace the human contact found in traditional face-to-face tutorials and seminars.As we have seen, there are major benefits to the introduction of technology into education, not leastbecause it enables modern forms of education such as distance learning courses. This is balanced,however, by the fact that it can be too impersonal for some and disadvantages others for their lack oftechnological skills.5. Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students’ performanceand should be replaced by continuous assessment. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Sampleessay with detailed advice on improving your paragraph structure.Sample Answer 1:Exams have always been used as way to measure students’ ability. However, contend that it is not anappropriate way to determine one’s performance and it should be substituted by continuous assessment.The reasons for my contention are as follows.Nowadays cheating on exams is commonplace and therefore it is not uncommon for students who don’tdo well in the class to score high on the exams. Thus, when the circumstance occurs, there’s no way forauthorities to confirm whether or not the answers on the exams are really from the students and not theresults of unfair play. Try as teachers might to forestall cheating from taking place, be it by strictinvigilating or by the threat to fail the students who don’t abide by the rules, there’s still no way toascertain that every student will comply with the rules, hence the ineffectiveness of utilizing exams as away of measuring the ability of each student.Furthermore, students have the tendency to memorize for exams without putting any effort in trying tothoroughly understand the materials taught. They will strive to obtain the highest score possible by thismeans. Memorizing is surely quick way to obtain good score in short time; however it is not aneffective way to study if one wants to deeply understand the materials. Consequently, exams are notappropriate when used to measure the ability of the students who memorize.In conclusion, believe that the best way to determine student’s ability is to continuously assess theirperformance in the classroom. By doing that, fair judgment of each student’s ability will be ensured andstudents will also be fairly scored based on how well they do inside the class.Doc24.vn6. Some people argue that universities should provide students with more practical training for theirfuture career. Should university education be more vocational or academic. Discuss.Sample Answer 1:The primary purpose of tertiary education is to prepare graduates for their future career. While thousandsof people would enrol for the sake of acquiring general knowledge and skills which will make themcompetitive on the job market, there is portion of them who would expect to obtain the specificqualifications only for their dream job. Therefore, strongly believe that university should organise theircourses’ programs in order to provide future employees with all the skill sharpening professional trainingfor their specific occupation.One compelling reason for this is that all the contemporary occupations nowadays are task specific whichmakes it necessity for workers to be able to comply with every job requirement. Once they graduate theyare expected to take over all the responsibilities their job needs them to do, have the know-how, as well asthe expertise to carry out all the arduous and demanding tasks. For instance, as soon as graduated at theFaculty of Philology had to take part-time teaching job. was overwhelmed with all the expectationsmy employer had in everyday practice, whereas there was no need at all of all the theory had masteredthroughout my studies.On the other hand, it is beyond doubt that most of the jobs would require employees to do lot of multi-tasking and to be capable of meeting deadlines while conducting project work. Apparently, big companieswould prefer to employ person well-equipped with all the necessary knowledge related to severalpositions within their range, instead of over-staffing. Notwithstanding the competitiveness amongbusinesses, there is always huge demand for the top notch professionals within one sector. This will bepossible, only and only if universities raise their standards and provide broad education and practice fortheir students.In conclusion, would maintain that tertiary education should be more content-specific and ensure thefastest and highest quality for their graduates. Not only will professionals be able to use their universityknowledge as catalyst towards their career, but they will be able to make living out of it for lifetime.7. In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think arethe causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?In numerous nations educational institutions are facing serious difficulties with the conduct of their pupils.This essay will suggest that poor parenting is the root cause of this phenomenon and submit that publicawareness campaign is the most viable solution, followed by reasoned conclusion.The principal cause of poor discipline in schools is poor discipline at home. Many mothers and fatherseither do not have the time or the skills required to teach their youngsters the value of manners andDoc24.vnrespecting authority. This results in many young people not listening to their teachers, being rude andactively rebelling against rules and regulations. For example, recent study by Cambridge Universityfound that in teenagers would refuse to comply with rule if they didn’t agree with it, compared tojust in in similar study in 1990.The most practical solution to this problem is government sponsored awareness campaign. An effectiveadvertising campaign could warn of the dangers of misbehaviour and hopefully raise awareness amongstthe public. For example, the United Kingdom recently lobbied their citizens to teach their children aboutthe importance of respecting teachers and this resulted in dramatic improvement.In summary, widespread negative behaviour in the classroom has been caused by caregivers not instillingthe values of deference and civility in their offspring; however this can be tackled through publiceducation programme that promotes these values. It is also recommended that people should attendparenting classes before their child starts kindergarten.8. Many universities charge higher fees for foreign students. Why do they do this? Do you believethat it is fair?Model Answer 1:Universities are the best place students always choose after their tertiary schooling. Most of the studentsprefer to study in good university. In my point of view, universities take large amount of money fromforeign students because they have to keep their standard and think it is fair to take more money from theforeign students.Firstly, universities carry out particular standard and reputation. When students choose selecteduniversity to study, it increases their productivity as well as overall development. The university chargeshuge fees for outside students so that they can have qualified and experienced lecturers to teach and mouldthem. There will be many facilities for the students to access like library, laboratories, multi-purpose hallsand so on. Universities offer accommodation and food to the students. Students can achieve their dreamby studying in reputed university with excellent professional background.Secondly, it is fair to take high fees from the foreign students because if they are getting the qualityeducation and facilities it is worth to get the money from them. They have many options in subjects and itsatisfies them by choosing the best university to study. On the other hand, universities do not take muchpayment from the citizens, they always try to care and protect their citizens by giving good qualityeducation. Moreover, many universities prefer more opportunities for the students to grow as an individualand to get good job in the future by giving the very good education. Many universities have differentpolicy for foreign students and they usually take higher fee from them. The citizens of country alreadypay large amount of tax to the government and thus government ensures the education for their childrenDoc24.vnand grand children. So it is totally justified that local students should pay less. To sum up, universities can charge huge fees from the students and the university should make sure thatthey are giving the best education to the students according to their wish.9. Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people. Some people arguethat this means they should pay the full cost of their education. To what extent do you agree ordisagree?Some conclude that college students should bear total expenses for their higher education on thegeneralization that college graduates usually receive higher salaries for similar jobs than those without acollege degree. We can not deny the fact that higher level of education, indeed, do associate with betterincome. Still, build on such fact alone, the conclusion remains questionable when more aspects are takeninto consideration.The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case that people with highereducation make more money than those less well-educated. But salary or income is, in most cases, basedon contributions made by employees to companies or organizations in which they are employed. Statisticsin the labor market indicate that people with professional training tend to find jobs easier than collegegraduates do and that blue-collar workers who do not hold college degrees are becoming the hotties in thelabor market. Employers prefer to hire and pay more to highly skilled and specially trained people ratherthan fresh college graduates. In the auto industry, for instance, skilled technicians make two or three timesmore than their college educated counterparts who make the average salaries in other companies. And it iswidely accepted that people's income is determined more by talent, hard work, and willingness to takerisks than solely by certain qualifications such as college education. Otherwise, the unemployment rate ofcollege graduates would not be increasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much ofpower in controlling the labor market. Admittedly in some knowledge extensive field such as research,teaching, and practice of law the labor force are primarily consists of highly educated professionals. Butsuch people make up only fraction of the labor market and are thus unrepresentative of the wholeemployment in general.Considering the goal of education, we find that it is even more problematic for the country to throw all theresponsibility of financing college education to college students. The goal of higher education of nationis to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of its labor force,thereby increasing the competency of the nation in the global economy. As tax payers, parents allcontributes to the education system and country in various ways. It is only reasonable and necessary thatthe country gives some forms of financially assistance to students to ease the burden of rising educationcosts. Such help should go to not only students from needy or impoverished families but also outstandingDoc24.vnstudents from affluent backgrounds. Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children frommillions of families to engage in higher level of study. It is understandable that the general quality ofpeople in country will improve and its economy will benefit both now and in years to follow.If the burden of supporting children's higher education is dumped on parents and students, thousands ofbrilliant students will be deprived of chances to pursue their academic inspiration. Among those whosuffer would definitely be future great scientists, business managers, artists and statesmen. The loss will bedisastrous and irreversible.In conclusion, the idea that students should also pay the full cost of their study is wrong and harmfulbecause it is wrong to assume that higher education necessarily equalize high income. Moreover, it is inthe best interest of nation to take responsibility in financing college education so that the goal of highereducation will be better met.10. Nothing is more important to country’s future than education. To what extent do you agree ordisagree?Trên đây chỉ là phần trích dẫn 10 trang đầu của tài liệu và có thế hiển thị lỗi font, bạn muốn xem đầyđủ tài liệu gốc thì ấn vào nút Tải về phía dưới.